Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were only released 2 months apart.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.