Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's a little thinner and lighter anyway. Both devices we are comparing include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a brighter screen and a little bit larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S's memory to store more games and applications is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro one, they have exactly the same internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro count with really similar processing units, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.