Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a overall score of 82.7 against 79.9. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a older and a little thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but Xiaomi was able to make it a bit lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with much more brightness and a bit bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a way larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.