Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better video quality, a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.