Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having an 83.8 score against 82.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro were released only 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is lighter and somewhat thinner. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A50. They have a screen of the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and the same display pixels density.
The Galaxy A50 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro count with similar batteries duration. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.