Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having an 86.6 score against 82.7. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Even when Samsung Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro were released only 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A50s is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50s. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the same screen density and a same size display. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same size sensor and a 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50s feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.