Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a overall score of 90.8 against 82.7. Galaxy A51 5G is a a bit thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a 48 MP back-facing camera and a same size camera sensor, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.