Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's overall score of 82.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per display inch, a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A52 has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.