Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, with a global score of 91.3 against 82.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower screen pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.