Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a 91.1 score against 82.7. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is notably newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, providing some extra features and performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a quite smaller display, a little worse pixels count in each inch of screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.