Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Although Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A70, it must be told that it's also a a little bit heavier and thicker cellphone. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.