Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a score of 92.9 against 82.7. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a larger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.