Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, with an 85.2 score against 82.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy F41 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy F41's construction has the same weight and thickness than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F41. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a screen that's very similar to Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's screen, and although the Samsung Galaxy F41 has less brightness, they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, a same size display and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the screen. Galaxy F41 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.