Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having an 88.1 score against 82.7. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, so it provides a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Although the Galaxy F62 is newer than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, it is heavier and just a little thicker.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger number of cores. Galaxy F62 and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy F62 has a little less pixels per inch in the display and less bright display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62's camera is very similar to the camera in Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although the Galaxy F62 has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor and a much better resolution camera.
Galaxy F62 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 75 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.