Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a 97.6 score against 82.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is way heavier but extremely thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and both were only released 1 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little better pixel quantity in each screen inch. The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold has a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.