Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's overall score of 82.7. Galaxy Note 20's body is newer and a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's, but it's a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Galaxy Note 20 has as much storage to install applications and games as the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro one, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with faster video frame rate and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.