Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a global score of 89 against 82.7. The Galaxy Note10 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Note10 feature similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite higher pixel count in each display inch. Galaxy Note10 features a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.