Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's global score of 82.7. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a bit larger display, way more display brightness, a just a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.