Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-20 | -- |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy S24 FE's 76 general score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is thicker but somewhat lighter than Galaxy S24 FE. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version and Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE also counts with way more screen brightness and a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S24 FE has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.