Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-20 | -- |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25, with an 82.7 score against 82.6. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a very superior performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit higher display density and a way brighter display. Galaxy S25 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a lot better video resolution and a camera with more megapixels.
Galaxy S25 and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro feature very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage. Galaxy S25 counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.