Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-20 | -- |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, with a score of 90.7 against 82.7. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a much brighter display, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a way better 200 megapixels resolution back camera, a much better video definition, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra features greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.