Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but both are 0.35inches thick. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.