Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-08-20 | -- |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy S6 Active's general score of 80.9. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro body has the same thickness than Galaxy S6 Active, but it's notably heavier. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a more recent 10 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, providing you some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater screen pixel density. Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light situations and a back facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.