Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's construction is a lot newer and thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's also just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen, a little bit more display brightness and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active count with very similar batteries duration. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.