Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's general score of 82.7. The Galaxy S9 is an older phone than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, but it is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Galaxy S9 features a better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 400 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.