Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro body is much thinner and way lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.