Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 82.7 score against 81. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were only released 5 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels, a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 1 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.