Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having an 88.5 score against 82.7. Galaxy Z Flip's body is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, even when both of them were only released 6 months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit worse screen density, a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.