Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a score of 92.3 against 82.7. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and enhanced performance. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer, a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, a quite lower display pixel density and a little smaller display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.