Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a 94.6 score against 82.7. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although it's incredibly heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.