Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a global score of 90.6 against 82.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, it's a lot thinner and also newer.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments and a way more megapixels camera. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.