Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 global score. These phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a newer and thinner cellphone than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it's also somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with much more brightness and a little better pixel amount per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.