Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-17 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, getting a global score of 88.1 against 82.2. IPhone X is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9T, but it is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and more screen brightness.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone X counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T takes much better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.