Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Interstellar Black |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's global score of 82.2. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9T, it's just a bit thinner and also way newer.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a lot brighter screen and a little bit larger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.