Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Cyber shade |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has an overall score of 82.2, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. These phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9T has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when Xiaomi Mi 9T and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released only a couple months apart, Xiaomi Mi 9T is lighter and just a little thinner.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger aperture to take better captures in low light environments and a much higher video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.