Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Ocean |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's global score of 82.2. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should offer the same operating system features. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a a little heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi 9T, but they are equally thin.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has way more display brightness, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little larger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.