Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-17 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, getting a global score of 83.8 against 82.2. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, although they were released only 3 months apart. The Galaxy A50's processing unit is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 9T one, and although the Galaxy A50 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50. Both of them have a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A50 features a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 9T one. The Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.