Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Mi 9T were released only 4 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A50s is lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices use the same Android 10 OS.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s. They have the same quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, a display of the same size and an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
Galaxy A50s has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50s counts with a battery life that is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 9T's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.