Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-17 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | -- |
| Metal and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 score. The Galaxy A52 body is newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52's processor is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 9T's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy A52 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and a lot better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.