Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, it's just a bit thicker and heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T and the Galaxy F62 count with quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy F62 has a little lower pixels density and less bright screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 9T one, and although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a lot more MP back facing camera and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.