Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-17 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, with a overall score of 97.6 against 82.2. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10. Even though Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Mi 9T were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy Fold's body is a lot thinner but incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.