Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a general score of 98.9 against 82.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, counting with some additional features and optimized performance. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9T, it's just a bit thinner and also newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a bit better screen pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little larger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a camera with much more megapixels and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.