Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-17 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Xiaomi Mi 9T's body is newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a processing unit that is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 9T one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a larger camera sensor.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.