Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a score of 82.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. Xiaomi Mi 9T's construction is extremely newer than Galaxy Note3's, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit better number of pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Mi 9T has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (although they are slower).
Xiaomi Mi 9T has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.