Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's overall score of 82.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, providing lots of additional features and enhanced performance. Galaxy S20 FE's design is newer, a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of display, a little lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.