Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-17 | -- |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | -- |
| Metal and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's score of 82.2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has much more brightness, a little higher pixels amount per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 200 MP resolution, a bigger aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.