Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-17 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has an overall score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9T is extremely newer than Galaxy S7, it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more 2200 megahertz processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 counts with a better display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel count in each screen inch. Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a back camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.