Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-17 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has an overall score of 82.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. Xiaomi Mi 9T's design is extremely newer and thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little brighter screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much more MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active's battery life is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 9T one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.