Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black |
| Metal and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 82.2 against 80.1. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9T has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Mi 9T is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is notably lighter and a lot thinner.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.