Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black |
| Metal and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 82.2 score against 81. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the older 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Mi 9T's design is lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though both were released with only a few months difference.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a little bit bigger display. Galaxy XCover Pro and Xiaomi Mi 9T count with quite similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures, a much better (4K) video resolution and a way more megapixels back camera. Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.